![]() When you take a reading, the device will tell you whether your rhythm is normal (sinus) or AFib. Afib is a huge underlying cause of strokes and other morbidities in the US – and most sufferers have no idea they have it. The ECG sensor is designed to pick up irregular heart rate rhythms, that can be a sign of atrial fibrillation (Afib). ![]() It adopts the same method of measuring electrical signals from your heart when users place their fingers on the case, to take an EKG.ĮCG readings are different from the usual heart rate readings because instead of determining the bpm of your heart, it analyses the regularity of each beat. ECG technology explainedįitbit additionally offers an ECG sensor on its Charge 5 and Sense smartwatch, matching the Apple Watch and Samsung's latest smartwatches to offer medical-grade heart rate readings. ![]() When you're not exercising, wear your device a finger's width below your wrist bone.Īnd when you are exercising, consider wearing the device slightly higher on your wrist for more accurate readings, since some exercises will cause your wrist to move frequently. If you sense your Fitbit device isn't quite tracking your heart rate correctly, there are a couple of things to keep in mind.įirstly, a good tight fit is extremely important as light leaking in from the sides of your watch will disrupt the signal. Naturally, as with any wrist-based monitor, you'll also need to make sure the back of the watch is touching the skin at all times, while also ensuring it isn't strapped too tightly onto your wrist. However, this is a problem shared by all optical sensors. When fluctuating between high heart rate and low heart rate during interval training can often prove to be problematic for an optical heart rate monitor to keep up with. But we have found Fitbit data to be largely accurate against such sensors. We would also say that anyone relying on the data for training purposes, such as running in zones, should use a chest strap sensor. Likewise, steady workouts (such as running and cycling) were also well-tracked. In our testing, resting and walking heart rates were measured with a high degree of accuracy. We have extensively tested all of the latest Fitbit devices and validated the sensor against control devices, heart rate straps, and manual spot readings taken by physicians. Like with any optical heart rate solution, Fitbit's PurePulse technology is solid, but not without its issues. Fitbit thinks it's devised a way to improve performance when that becomes a factor. Wrist movement or motion is one of the biggest obstacles to providing an accurate reading. ![]() Shelten Yuen, vice president of research at Fitbit says that the improved setup yields an average signal to noise ratio increase of 56% for running exercises. It means that Fitbit can now use 6 independent optical channels across a larger surface area to improve the reliability of the data.ĭr. It's achieving that by increasing the number of light transmitters and receivers that are used to get that data. Naturally, while every company dabbling with this optical sensor technology is working from the same blueprint, the accuracy of the readings will come down to how each company's algorithms interpret the data.įitbit's Versa 3 and Sense watches ushered in PurePulse 2.0, which aims to improve the performance of that sensor technology. These lights are then flashed hundreds of times per second to gain the most accurate BPM (beats per minute) data. When your heart beats, this flow, and as a result, the green light absorbed is greater. So by using green LEDs and pairing them with photodiodes, Fitbit uses its own in-house PurePulse technology to detect the amount of blood flowing through the wrist. Photoplethysmography essentially works upon one simple premise: blood is red because it reflects red light and absorbs green light.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |